Climate of the Past, Present and Future — A Scientific Debate

Climate of the Past, Present and Future — A Scientific Debate

Fossil Future

Epstein’s ‘Fossil Future’

“Epstein focuses on the ‘big picture’ facts of how fossil fuels are helping the world’s populations to live longer, better, safer lives, while managing the side-effects of increasing CO2 emissions.”

Placeholder title 1

A Review of Dr. John Christy’s Book “Is it Getting Hotter in Fresno…or Not?”

His thorough examination of Fresno’s temperatures suggests there is no climate crisis.

Placeholder title 2

The Great Climate Change Debate – Karoly vs Happer

February 15, 2016, was the beginning of a debate on man-made climate change between two well-known experts in the field, Princeton Professor of Physics Dr. William Happer and University of Melbourne Atmospheric Sciences Professor Dr. David Karoly, hosted by James Barham and his team at TheBestSchools.org. Both have been heavily involved in atmospheric research since the 1980s. Happer believes that burning fossil fuels will have a minimal effect on climate but a large benefit to plant life and humanity. Karoly believes the opposite.

Placeholder title 3

Book Review: FALLEN ICON by Susan J. Crockford

“A fantastic read! Take a deep dive into the intrigue and devious deception perpetrated on the world by a detailed list of international operators ….

Placeholder title 4

Viral, A Review

By Andy May Alina Chan is a molecular biologist specializing in gene therapy and cell engineering at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. She partnered with the famous science…

Placeholder title 5

The Tragedy of the Climate Wars

Consistently demonizing those who think differently than you makes it harder, if not impossible, to forge alliances.

Placeholder title 6

Book Review: Patrick Moore, ‘Fake Invisible Catastrophes and Threats of Doom’

…he poses a question. He asks the reader to ponder why it is that so many of the so-called proofs of the warming hypothesis are based on things that are either invisible or inaccessible to the average person. In the invisible category he cites carbon dioxide and radiation and in the remote category he cites Polar Bears and coral reefs. As average people find it hard to carry out a Polar Bear count, they are forced to rely on, and trust, the ‘experts’ who have the financial backing and incentive to perpetuate the story.